<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Data Quality Riot Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/</link>
	<description>A blog about databases, business intelligence, and an outlet for my inner geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 02:17:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Have you built your DQ trust today? : SmarterSoftware Blog</title>
		<link>http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you built your DQ trust today? : SmarterSoftware Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robpaller.com/?p=217#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>[...] A Data Quality Riot Act by Rob Paller [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Data Quality Riot Act by Rob Paller [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heute schon das Vertrauen in DQM erh&#246;ht? : SmarterSoftware Blog</title>
		<link>http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Heute schon das Vertrauen in DQM erh&#246;ht? : SmarterSoftware Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 09:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robpaller.com/?p=217#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>[...] A Data Quality Riot Act von Rob Paller [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Data Quality Riot Act von Rob Paller [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Paller</title>
		<link>http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Paller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robpaller.com/?p=217#comment-195</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Adrian&lt;/b&gt; - Thank you for taking the time to comment. We are in a great position to help them understand the that what they perceive is throwing a pebble in the pond will cause ripples that affect every one else in the pond. (Pardon the cliche...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Adrian</b> &#8211; Thank you for taking the time to comment. We are in a great position to help them understand the that what they perceive is throwing a pebble in the pond will cause ripples that affect every one else in the pond. (Pardon the cliche&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Noble</title>
		<link>http://robpaller.com/archive/2010/01/a-data-quality-riot-act/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robpaller.com/?p=217#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Terrific example. I agree with Thorsten, though, that another low-key conversation with the business is in order. There must be some perceived benefit for the business unit in doing it this way, and if you can identify this and show them a better way (i.e. one that does not screw up downstream users) of achieving it, that would be preferable.
Of course, if they are deliberately ignoring IT and, especially, DM, the the riot act may be in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Terrific example. I agree with Thorsten, though, that another low-key conversation with the business is in order. There must be some perceived benefit for the business unit in doing it this way, and if you can identify this and show them a better way (i.e. one that does not screw up downstream users) of achieving it, that would be preferable.<br />
Of course, if they are deliberately ignoring IT and, especially, DM, the the riot act may be in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
